Opinion & Analysis
My Take: Could TGL’s shot clock be a fix for traditional golf’s slow play dilemma?
In the dynamic world of sports, innovation is the engine of evolution. Major sports leagues have adopted various means to quicken their pace and enhance their appeal, and golf, despite its centuries-long traditions, is ripe for similar reforms. A major concern that has haunted both professional and recreational golfers alike is the issue of slow play. As the sport gears up to embrace modernity with the introduction of Tiger and Rory’s new TGL Indoor Golf League, an innovative solution looms on the horizon—implementing a shot clock. This concept, though not without its complexities if ever considered for golf on the course, offers a tantalizing glimpse into the future of the game as a potential slow play solution.
The introduction of a shot clock could be a potent remedy to golf’s often cumbersome pace. Unlike basketball, tennis, or football, where time limits govern most actions, golf has traditionally been played without any pressing time constraints. This absence of time management has led to rounds that stretch on indefinitely, testing even the most dedicated fan’s patience.
TGL, which will debut on ESPN and ESPN+ on January 7th, is poised to revolutionize this aspect by integrating a simple shot clock. This move not only caters to the contemporary viewer’s preference for brisk action but also challenges players to streamline their decision-making process under pressure.
Now, hear me out. And before I start, yes, I understand that TGL is not the same as traditional golf, but implementing a shot clock in the conventional game could work if a straightforward adaption and a set of rules were established. Players could be allotted a fixed duration, say 30 to 45 seconds, to take their shot. This time limit, though variable depending on the complexity of the shot or situation, encourages efficiency. Cues such as a digital clock on the golf cart that is visible to the player could initiate the countdown when the golfer approaches the ball. Penalties for exceeding the time limit could range from stroke penalties to warnings, fostering a sense of urgency that respects both the player’s concentration and fellow golfers’ time.
Adapting this concept to recreational play would indeed require thoughtful adjustments. The convivial nature of recreational golf means not every player is engaged in serious competition; hence, flexibility in enforcement is crucial. Local clubs could introduce adjustable shot clocks or even encourage players to self-govern as a way to embrace a faster pace organically. This might mean implementing clocks during peak hours or tournaments, allowing for leisurely play during other times, thus accommodating the diversity in players’ intentions when hitting the course.
A predictive ripple effect of implementing the shot clock in TGL is much more dynamic broadcasting. With the average time per shot reduced, broadcasts will feature more varied and rich content, engaging viewers with a tighter, action-packed narrative, not at all the norm in traditional golf viewing. With this, the golf industry might witness an influx of new players and fans intrigued by the sport’s quicker tempo through this prime-time, made-for-television style of golf, widening the sport’s demographic reach.
Implementing a shot clock in golf presents a promising opportunity for the sport’s future. However, this approach faces several challenges. Traditionalists who cherish the leisurely pace of golf may resist such a change, as may players who view their pre-shot routines as essential to their performance. Therefore, any proposed rule changes should consider these perspectives, aiming for a balance between tradition and modernity.
Introducing a shot clock could help address one of golf’s most persistent issues—slow play—by aligning the sport more closely with the pace of contemporary sports culture, as seen in team sports. At a minimum, TGL’s implementation of this concept could get people talking about what it could do for the game in its traditional form. It could set a significant precedent, encouraging clubs and tournaments to embrace this innovative approach. As golf seeks to attract more fans through exciting changes, implementing a shot clock could act as a catalyst, ensuring the sport remains relevant and appealing to future generations.
Reader, please support me by checking out my three weekly columns on RG.org. On Mondays, I present “The Starter,” which recaps the week gone by in golf. On Wednesdays, I give you “Fairway Focus,” which previews the week to come in golf. And on Fridays, I dish up the “Friday Fore-cast,” a look at what’s on tap for the upcoming weekend.
Editor’s note: “My Take” will be an ongoing weekly series where Brendon shares his thoughts and opinions on various aspects of the game and industry. These are Brendon’s opinions and do not necessarily reflect those of GolfWRX, its staff, and its affiliates.
Opinion & Analysis
AVL: My U.S. Amateur local qualifying experience
This past Monday, I played in the U.S. Amateur local qualifier at Rock Creek Country Club in Portland, Oregon. A full tee sheet from 7:30 a.m. to 1:55 p.m., the top 11 scores would make it to the U.S. Amateur final qualifying.
I teed off at 10:48 a.m.. With the 7:30 am tee time, you can get a feel for the leaders’ pace, and they were off and running on the challenging setup at Rock Creek.
View this post on Instagram
Getting to the highlight of the round on the par five 17th, a drive up the left side and 212 yards left to the front hole location. I took out a 5-iron with plans of middle of the green. The ball ended up 8 feet left of the hole, pin high. A slight downhill putt dropped in for an eagle 3 on the 17th. With the cut line looking to be anywhere from -2 to even par. This was the boost I had been waiting for all day.
With making par from the trees on 18, it was time to wait for a potential playoff with a posted score of one under par 71.
Three hours later, it was playoff time. 8 players for 6 spots. I made par on the playoff hole, which was good enough to advance to the U.S. Amateur final qualifying in July. USGA qualifiers sure deliver on all of the emotions in golf!
Club Junkie
Building my 2026 gamer WITB: Ranking the contenders and new putter projects – Club Junkie Podcast
The annual What’s In The Bag build is underway, and on this episode of Club Junkie, Brian breaks down the clubs currently leading the race for a spot in his 2026 gamer setup. From drivers and fairway woods to irons, wedges, and shafts, he ranks the equipment that’s performing best and explains what’s separating the front runners from the rest of the field.
Brian also heads into the workshop to discuss several putter projects currently on the bench. From head options and shaft choices to build ideas and testing plans, he shares what he’s working on and which putters could become serious contenders for the bag this season.
If you’re a gear junkie who loves equipment testing, club building, and the never-ending pursuit of the perfect setup, this episode is for you.
Follow Club Junkie:
Instagram: @clubjunkiepod
TikTok: @clubjunkiepod
Threads: @clubjunkiepod
X: @ClubJunkiePod
Club Junkie
Tour Edge Exotics mini driver review + TaylorMade Spider ZT Max first look – Club Junkie
On this episode of Club Junkie, I put the new Tour Edge Exotics Mini Driver to the test and break down the performance, forgiveness, distance, and where it fits compared to a traditional driver or strong fairway wood. If you have been curious about adding a mini driver to the bag, this one is worth a look.
I also dive into the new TaylorMade Spider ZT Max putter that was recently spotted and discuss the growing zero torque putter trend. Plus, there is a closer look at the new Project X Titan Yellow shaft showing up on the PGA Tour and what makes it different from other profiles currently out there.
-
Equipment6 days agoMemorial Tournament Tour Report: Rory McIlroy, Cameron Young switch up drivers, and more
-
News2 weeks agoRussell Henley’s winning WITB: 2026 Charles Schwab Challenge
-
Whats in the Bag4 days agoJ.T. Poston’s winning WITB: 2026 Memorial Tournament
-
Equipment3 days agoBest irons 2026: Best irons overall, most forgiving irons, and more
-
Equipment1 week agoDetails on Jason Day’s latest prototype Avoda iron setup
-
Equipment3 weeks agoCJ Cup Byron Nelson Tour Report: Koepka and Kim’s newest putters finally get hot
-
News2 weeks agoCharles Schwab Challenge Tour Report: MacIntyre, Åberg and Spaun all switch putters, TaylorMade launches new Spider
-
Equipment2 weeks agoDetails on J.J. Spaun’s surprise putter switch

Pingback: Collin Morikawa Demands Fining Slow Players to Fix PGA Tour’s Prolonged Playing Issue – Adventure & Leisure Daily
Ned
Jan 6, 2025 at 6:16 am
They already have a time standard but don’t use it. A clock would only work if they enforce it. I think slow play is killing golf.
Karsten's Ghost
Jan 6, 2025 at 12:23 am
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VXm-82Hy_Fw
I love how once America tries it, it’s their idea. Been done before. It’s not all it’s cracked up to be.
Mac
Jan 5, 2025 at 5:51 am
Agree, a shot clock system is worth a try, today’s pace of play is painful. There are however a few fast players like Åberg, Koepka etc. which is great and it shows that you can play great golf fast. Btw. Shot clocks was used in a tournament on the european tour in 2018.
Vivienne
Jan 3, 2025 at 11:34 am
Good read ! We can tell the writer has used sound logic