Equipment

Mizuno JPX-EZ Forged and JPX-EZ irons: What you need to know

Published

11 years ago

Aug 24, 2015

[quote_box_center]“We’re always trying to take a game-improvement iron and make it feel more like a muscleback,” says Chris Voshall, club designer at Mizuno.[/quote_box_center]

Case in point, Mizuno’s new JPX-EZ Forged and JPX-EZ irons. While the irons use different materials and constructions than the company’s new MP-5 muscleback irons, many of the design initiatives were the same. Chiefly, how can performance be maximized without sacrificing the feel for which Mizuno irons are known?

Here’s what you need to know about the JPX-EZ Forged and JPX-EZ irons.

Mizuno JPX-EZ Forged Irons

The irons are forged from Mizuno’s 1025 Boron material, which is 30 percent stronger than the 1025E Carbon Steel the company used in the 2013 model. That allowed engineers to make structures of the irons thinner, specifically the iron faces, which improve ball speed for more distance. It also created more discretionary weight, which gave engineers the ability to move weight lower and deeper in the head design to improve forgiveness.

Mizuno calls the JPX-EZ Forged “Forged irons anyone can play.” Narrowing it down, they’re for discerning golfers who want more distance and forgiveness than smaller forged cavity back irons can deliver.

To give the JPX-EZ Forged irons more distance, Mizuno added its largest pocket cavity to the 4, 5, 6 and 7 irons, which are CNC milled behind the iron faces. They serve to lower the CG of the irons, creating a higher launch and less spin, which is the key for golfers to hit their long irons farther. The 8, 9, PW and GW have a solid-cavity design that aids with trajectory control.

The JPX-EZ Forged irons have the company’s redesigned “Power Frame” cavity back design, which pushes weight to the extreme four corners of the iron heads. That not only adds forgiveness, but creates a rigid frame that contributes to a more solid feel at impact.

The other benefit of Power Frame is that it allowed Mizuno engineers to make the forged boron iron faces even thinner toward the perimeter of the irons – especially in the long irons. This variable face thickness (thicker in the center, thinner on the edges) expands the sweet spot for more consistent distance control.

Mizuno’s Triple-Cut Sole.

The JPX-EZ Forged irons have Mizuno’s Triple-Cut sole design (above), which has a beveled leading edge that’s designed to improve turf interaction as the club enters the ground, and a relieved trailing edge that helps the club exit the turf with minimal drag.

At address: A JPX-EZ Forged 6 iron.

The JPX-EZ irons have a black nickel plated finish and come stock with True Temper’s new XP 95 shaft. They sell for $999 for an eight-piece set ($1,099 in graphite) and are available in 4-GW (RH and LH). They’re in stores Sept. 18.

JPX-EZ Forged Iron Specs

Mizuno JPX-EZ Irons

The JPX-EZ irons are cast from 17-4 stainless steel, and use Mizuno’s “Power Frame” and “Dual Max COR Pocket Cavity” technologies to create hot-faced, high-flying irons with maximum forgiveness.

As in the JPX-EZ Forged irons, Mizuno’s Power Frame technology pushes weight to the corners of the golf club to improve forgiveness, feel and distance. The club faces use Mizuno’s multi-thickness COR Tech design, which achieves thin-faced, high coefficient of restitution (COR) long irons for more distance, and thicker-faced, more uniform-thickness short irons and wedges for greater trajectory control.

The Power Frame is also essential to support Mizuno’s Dual Max COR Pocket Cavity Technology, which includes deep “pockets” on the sole and top lines of the irons. The weight savings from the two pockets were also redistributed low and deep in the club heads to improve moment of inertia (MOI), a measure of ball speed retention on mishits.

Just how much weight did Mizuno remove from behind the faces of the irons? So much that the number stampings (5, 6, etc.) had to be relocated to the toe side of the irons, as the structure was too thin to support the shallow indent.

The JPX-EZ irons have considerably wider soles and longer blade lengths than the JPX-EZ Forged.

Compared to previous game-improvement irons from Mizuno, the JPX-EZ irons have a lower-profile design that makes the clubs easier to hit higher. The shape of the irons was also tweaked in a way that gives the irons a more linear appearance at address.

At address: The JPX-EZ irons (left) irons are larger and have thicker top lines and more offset than the JPX-EZ Forged irons.

The JPX-EZ irons have a black nickel plated finish, and come stock with True Temper’s XP 95 shafts. They’re available in 4-SW, and sell for $799 (steel) and $899 (graphite) for an eight-piece set for RH and LH golfers. They’re in stores Sept. 18.

JPX-EZ Iron Specs

See what GolfWRX Members are saying about the new irons in our forum.

Related Topics:irons Mizuno

Up Next

Monday Tour Mash: Love III turns back time, Woods falters

Don't Miss

15 Revealing photos from the Wyndham Championship

Zak Kozuchowski

28 Comments

Primo

Aug 26, 2015 at 8:15 pm

Still playing the MX 900 myself. Also a bit chunky, but forged and I know where they are going. 8-W looks more blade like. Tried all the new Zunos and basically everything else. Like the extra distance somewhat with new versions, but am OK hitting an 8 rather than saying wedge. I do get a club or more with newer clubs. My opinion re: the 5 gap on low irons versus 4 is that the faces are so much faster, having them spaced at only 4 causes a bit more overlap than preferred. I borrowed all of the new Zunos (800, 825, 850, EZ old model forged and cast) 7 iron and down from my local shop, liked them all, hit them farther, but never pulled the trigger…maybe this time around. Also borrowed Callaway fx, new and old ping g’s, also more distance, but new stuff comes out right around the time I make a choice and have to start all over.

Reply Report comment
christian

Aug 26, 2015 at 4:06 am

I find it weird the forged comes with shafts that are 0.5 inches shorter than the non-forged, with a 5-iron at 37.75, which is JDM-short.
Also, pretty flat lie angles, around 1.5 degrees flatter than usual US/Euro standard, again straight short person/JDM specs. Odd

Reply Report comment
- Mikte T
  
  Aug 26, 2015 at 4:16 pm
  
  Not sure where you are getting your info. All the JPX EZ and EZ Forged are 37.75″ for both steel and graphite. Lengthwise this was the standard for US irons and has nothing to do with the JDM. Titleist, Taylormade, Callaway, etc have been jacking up the lengths for distance and therefore the lie angles. As always, although I rarely comply, get fitted.
  
  Reply Report comment
tim

Aug 25, 2015 at 3:06 pm

I played the original EZ forged with kbs tours and really liked them, but they were very heavy, at least for me. I ended up selling them but they were great irons.

Reply Report comment
Martin

Aug 25, 2015 at 4:29 am

These look better than the first ones in this series.

The non-forged looked like shovels before, I just upgraded my 5 year of JPX800’s to 825.

I didn’t care for the feel of the JPX-EZ forged when I tried them, these are nice looking.

Reply Report comment
Golfraven

Aug 24, 2015 at 4:09 pm

Video helped and the forged club has a nice finish to it. However the Dude does not show the top line which maybe not as appealing to some players. Still would give it a shot on the range.

Reply Report comment
eJc

Aug 24, 2015 at 2:51 pm

what is the difference between these and the jpx850 forged?

Reply Report comment
- Dave
  
  Aug 25, 2015 at 10:42 am
  
  I’m wondering the same thing.
  
  Reply Report comment
- Crk
  
  Aug 25, 2015 at 3:30 pm
  
  these are more game improvement. The 850 forged are basically the same as the 825 pro, the EZ forged falls in between the 850( which are really SGI) and the 850 forged. More offset and more forgiveness.
  
  Reply Report comment
  - KK
    
    Aug 26, 2015 at 6:57 am
    
    Great comment. I would only add that the EZ line also seems to emphasize distance.
    
    Reply Report comment
jakeanderson

Aug 24, 2015 at 2:47 pm

they do not look good.

Reply Report comment
- John
  
  Aug 24, 2015 at 3:20 pm
  
  I disagree wholeheartedly.
  
  Reply Report comment
sk33tr

Aug 24, 2015 at 1:52 pm

I play the EZ Forged w/ Recoil 95’s. These irons flat out perform. Cannot wait to try the updated version. Say what you want about the finish. I like to hear my playing partners say “Nice shot” every time I’m knocking it on the green.

Reply Report comment
- Keith
  
  Nov 15, 2015 at 11:36 am
  
  I have played the original version of the EZ Forged for two years. The specs appear to be identical, but I have demoed the new version and found the 4-7 irons are longer and more forgiving. The triple-cut sole improved the turf interaction around the greens for chipping and pitching over the straight cut sole. I’m also looking at the 850 Forged.
  
  Reply Report comment
Mark

Aug 24, 2015 at 1:24 pm

Oh dear lord no. Chunky and cheap looking. New Mizuno offerings are starting to worry me.

Reply Report comment
- Nolanski
  
  Aug 24, 2015 at 1:37 pm
  
  These are GI irons, not blades right? They are supposed to be “chunky”.
  
  Reply Report comment
- Crk
  
  Aug 25, 2015 at 3:31 pm
  
  Game improvement irons, they are all chunky. Not all Mizuno’s are made for single digit players
  
  Reply Report comment
John

Aug 24, 2015 at 1:16 pm

I’ll be very interested to compare the EZ Forged to the Z545s.

Reply Report comment
Philip

Aug 24, 2015 at 12:43 pm

The only thing I don’t like is the tweaking of lofts away from 4 degrees and the bizarre tendency of other manufacturers to have odd length gaps. 4 degree lofts, regardless of design, give me consistent yardages when combined with 1/2 inch increments in length (though some PW are 1/4 inch). I’ve talked to manufacturers and no one can give me any reason for the increased lofts at the high end, so one the only reason I see is the disappearance of the 3i as the 4i approaches 20 degrees. Everyone is different, but having 3, 3.25, 3.5, 4, 5 differences in lofts, as well as 1/2, 3/8, 5/8 in lengths for some OEMs, doesn’t look like it is for the golfer, but a bandage for the manufacture due to loft creep. Too bad – as I really like some of these newer designs.

Reply Report comment
- Jay
  
  Aug 24, 2015 at 3:13 pm
  
  I had always thought it was to keep distance gaps consistent. Did not think the relationship between loft and distance was purely linear. Going from 20 to 24 degrees adds 20% of loft, but going from 24 to 28 only adds 16% of loft??
  
  Reply Report comment
  - Philip
    
    Aug 24, 2015 at 7:45 pm
    
    The length of the club adds a lot to the yardage gaps and for decades 4 degrees of loft worked pretty good and suddenly now they need 5 degrees for the higher clubs. For myself I get consistent yardages with 4 degrees and my SGI clubs are from 2003. In the end, if the set generates evenly spaced yardages then all is well. Of course, soon they can call the 4i a 3i and say they are going with classic lofts and start the loft creep all over again. Besides, if it truly is to evenly gap the irons then why are they not increasing the gaps at the low end? I place with a lot more golfers that cannot get any extra yardage after their 6i/5i than have issues with their 9i/PW.
    
    Reply Report comment
HackerDav31

Aug 24, 2015 at 12:23 pm

TWO sets of irons?? They release too much product!! Just buy the new ones in 3 months! These are going to destroy the value of my current set!! I hate options as a consumer!! They’re ruining Golf!! Rabble, rabble, rabble…

Oh, wait. Mizuno? Sorry… Wrong brand.

Reply Report comment
Nolanski

Aug 24, 2015 at 10:15 am

Top line seems about as thick as the Callaway Apex’s. I wanted to hit a few different forged cavity back irons this fall or next spring. These will be on the short list for sure.

Reply Report comment
- Duane
  
  Aug 25, 2015 at 8:26 am
  
  No the Apex’s top line is quite thinner than these. If I were you I would rather look at their non-EZ JPX series. The last ones were the JPX850, not sure what the new ones will be named.
  
  Reply Report comment
  - Chris
    
    Sep 2, 2015 at 6:03 pm
    
    They won’t have a new line replacing the JPX 850 this year. It’s MP-5, MP-25, EZ and EZ Forged. JPX 850’s will be going into their second year of the two-year cycle so nothing new to replace those. What will be getting phased out with these new releases will be MP-4, MP-64, and the first line of EZ and EZ Forged.
    
    Reply Report comment
KCCO

Aug 24, 2015 at 10:14 am

Def like look, and previous forged model was def a success but how long will the black last? Will they look like they have been played two seasons after two rounds? I love black club heads, but the satin silver of last EZ I would think would hold up much longer. I’m sure the technology has progressed, but I just wouldn’t want an iron to look beat after a few rounds. Of course they are just tools of the game, but I do like equipment that holds up, and have yet to see a club head with a black finish hold up.

Reply Report comment
JBuer

Aug 24, 2015 at 9:27 am

I like the look of these better than the first gen version!

Reply Report comment
- Mike T
  
  Aug 26, 2015 at 4:19 pm
  
  Ditto! Especially since I have to live with my OG EZ Forged. Top line looks quite a bit thicker.
  
  Reply Report comment

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Whats in the Bag

Christiaan Maas WITB 2026 (June)

Published

9 hours ago

Jun 11, 2026

GolfWRX Staff

Driver: TaylorMade Qi4D LS (8 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus TR Blue 6 X

3-wood: TaylorMade Qi10 (15 degrees)
Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 9 TX

Irons: TaylorMade P770 (3), TaylorMade P7CB (4), TaylorMade P7TW (5-PW)
Shafts: Fujikura Ventus Black HB 10 X, True Temper Dynamic Gold X100

Wedges: TaylorMade Prototype (50-SB09), TaylorMade MG5 (56-HB12, 60-LV07)
Shafts: True Temper Dynamic Gold S400

Putter: TaylorMade TP Juno

Ball: Titleist Pro V1x

Grips: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Cord

Check out more in-hand photos of Christiaan Maas’ clubs here.

Equipment

TaylorMade MySpider Tour and Tour X: More customizable build options now available

Published

9 hours ago

Jun 11, 2026

Alistair Cameron

TaylorMade Golf’s MySpider program underwent a substantial overhaul over the last month. Firstly, the company launched the option to customize the Spider ZT model, and now the program has returned with the MySpider Tour and MySpider Tour X.

The revamped page now gives golfers complete control over every visual and functional detail of their putter on the popular Tour and Tour X head, with every cosmetic idea thought of. In MySpider Tour, golfers can choose from four head finishes, 16 paint fill colors, nine Surlyn face insert colors, three aluminum insert options, six sightline configurations, and four hosel options — L-neck, small slant, double bend, center shaft. Six sightline options are available in MySpider Tour, including the optically engineered True Path alignment system. MySpider Tour X gives builders the option of four head finishes, four hosel configurations, and five sightline options, also including True Path alignment.

One of the more interesting features of the new MySpider program is the availability of three distinct face insert options. Along with the usual Surlyn Pure Roll insert trusted by Scottie Scheffler and Rory McIlroy, which can be customized from nine colors, golfers can now also select firmer options. Two are offered with the black aluminum Pure Roll insert, slightly firmer than the traditional insert, or for the firmest feel, golfers can choose from two colors of milled aluminum inserts.

Another fun addition to the MySpider Tour is the ability to use the “Tommy Sightline.” The custom alignment aid design, which was first drawn onto Tommy Fleetwood’s putter by PGA Tour Rep James Holley, is based on the milled sightline on his Spider ZT head. There are five shorter lines on the left and right of a longer central line serving as the traditional short line alignment aid.

See below for the full specifications sheet for MySpider Tour and Tour X:

MySpider Tour

MySpider Tour X

Equipment

Then and now: Comparing Rory McIlroy’s current setup to his record-breaking 2019 Canadian Open victory

Published

12 hours ago

Jun 11, 2026

Alistair Cameron

In Rory McIlroy’s first appearance at the 2019 RBC Canadian Open, he crushed the record books to earn his 16th PGA Tour title in dominating fashion, winning by seven shots over Shane Lowry and Webb Simpson.

McIlroy’s score of 22-under-par 258 is the lowest 72-hole score to date at the Canadian Open, and his closing 61 is also the best final-round score in the history of one of golf’s oldest tournaments. Finally, with his win in 2019, McIlroy became only the sixth player to win the career Triple Crown, adding to his victories at the U.S. Open in 2011 and The Open Championship in 2014, joining Tommy Armour, Walter Hagen, Arnold Palmer, Lee Trevino and Tiger Woods in a coveted list.

So, with that, why not compare his current setup to the clubs he used to break all the records?

Driver

2019: TaylorMade M5 (9 degrees), Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White 70 TX
2026: TaylorMade Qi4D (9 degrees @8), Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 7X (45 5/8 inches)

McIroy led the Tour in Strokes Gained: Off-the-Tee in 2019; he’s doing the same in 2026. Between now and then, McIlroy has switched from the Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White 70 TX (a shaft with slightly more feeling in the tip) to the original Fujikura Ventus Black 7X, having just made the change to the heavier version from playing the 60X.

What’s interesting about McIlroy’s 2019 setup is that the weighting on his driver is actually set in the high-draw setting, using the T-Track weighting system, whereas in the Qi4D, he’s currently using a heavily rear-weighted setup. (Two 13-gram weights in the rear and only two 4-gram front weights.)

The TaylorMade M5 driver he played in during his Canadian Open win was the company’s first head that they claimed to design to initially exceed the USGA’s COR limit, and then injected with tuning resin to bring it back in bounds.

Fairway woods

2019: TaylorMade M6 3-wood (15 degrees), Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White 80 TX; TaylorMade M5 5-wood (19 degrees), Shaft: Mitsubishi Tensei CK Pro White 90 TX
2026: TaylorMade Qi4D 3-wood (15 degrees), Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 8X; TaylorMade Qi4D 5-wood (18 degrees), Shaft: Fujikura Ventus Black 9X

The TaylorMade M6 fairway wood that McIlroy was using during the 2019 season is still in the bag of some of the best golfers on Tour in 2026. Just check out Justin Rose’s winning setup from the Farmers Insurance Open earlier this year. This year, though, McIlroy has still been searching for his top-end-of-the-bag setup, having played both the new Qi4D and the Qi10, which he won the Masters with.

The same shaft swap can be seen in the fairway woods as the driver, along with slightly less loft on the 5-wood.

Irons

2019: TaylorMade P750 (4) Buy here, TaylorMade P730 (5-9), Shafts: Project X 7.0
2026: TaylorMade P760 (4), TaylorMade Rors Proto (5-9), Shafts: Project X 7.0

The biggest difference between McIlroy’s custom set and the stock P730s is the groove design. While the P730s were constructed with 14 MX-9 grooves on their milled faces, McIlroy’s proto heads instead use the higher-spinning, 16-groove layout of the TW2 grooves. Other big differences between the sets are that McIlroy’s 7- and 8-irons have thinner toplines, are 1 degree stronger in loft, and are 1/4 inch longer than the original P730 builds.

With McIlroy’s 4-iron, the switch from P750 to P760 sees a transition to a two-piece construction with Speed Foam in it, which allows McIlroy to launch the ball slightly higher, with more workability.

Wedges

2019: TaylorMade Milled Grind (48-09SB), TaylorMade MG Hi-Toe (52-09SB, 56-09SB, 60-LB09), Shafts: Project X Rifle 6.5
2026: TaylorMade MG5 (46-09SB, 50-09SB, 54-11SB, 60-08LB @61), Shafts: Project X 6.5 (46-54), Project X 6.5 Wedge (60)

Between 2019 and 2026, McIlroy’s focus on his short game has been much more apparent. It was the reason why he switched back to the TP5 golf ball, to help with launch, spin and control with his wedges leading up to his career Grand Slam victory in 2025. The most apparent changes to McIlroy’s wedge setup are his lofts and bounce. He’s slowly delofted his pitching to a sand wedge, but has increased the loft on the lob wedge, bending his current 60-degree to 61. With that, adding more loft to his lob wedge also slightly increases the bounce and leading-edge sit point, so, as a result, he plays a lower-bounce lob wedge compared to 2019. The MG5 wedges are also softer than the first Milled Grind option from 2019. McIlroy also no longer plays the full-face grooves found on the Hi-Toe.

Putter

2019: TaylorMade Spider X
2026: TaylorMade Spider Tour X

Notice anything similar. Yes, the copper finish on Rory McIlroy’s Spider X putter in 2019 is a slightly more reflective finish than the recently released torched PVD finish. McIlroy was using the True Path alignment system, but now uses only a single white sightline.

Ball

2019: 2019 TaylorMade TP5 (#22)
2026: 2025 TaylorMade TP5 (RORS)

As mentioned above, McIlroy had transitioned from the TP5 to TP5x golf ball since his victory in Canada in 2019, but now is black with the same style of golf ball as his victory at Hamilton Golf & Country Club.

Grips

2019: Golf Pride Tour Velvet Cord
2026: Golf Pride MCC

Interesting, McIlroy actually used Golf Pride’s Tour Velvet Cord grips during his victory in 2019 (it was during a 2+ year switch to the corded TV) as opposed to his usual MCC grips, which he has played for most of his career.